|
|
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
home | recipe box | cooking recipe e-book | recipe management software | gourmet web template | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Others say...
"A COEN Brothers masterpiece" This is a TRULY great movie, with a flawless script, incredible directing, cinematography and acting. WOW. The COEN brothers, who always have fantastic dialog, where many times, it takes the second watching of their movies to catch all of the humor and subtlties, made an extremely, "Quiet" movie. They left the camera and the sound of the southwest do the talking for them. There was not a scene in this morality play that was NOT totally fascinating and it grabs the audience totally with 10 seconds. To be great, there always has to be a fantastic villain. Where the heck did they get this incredible Spanish actor, with his warped sense of morality and ability to be so amoral, yet so human at the same time. That gentle voice and mannerisms of his, as well as his gentle features, REALLY made him frightening. The movie really shows the decline in morality and ethics in the U.S. The insanity and accepted amoral behavior of the leadership in the U.S., the random violence, the ends justify the means and how hard it is for many of us to accept and understand the lack of ethics, morality and random violence that is all over our society. From the gang violence and acceptance of torture and outright destruction and murder of innocent civilians going on in Iraq to the using of the children in our military like waste products for individual gain and profit. I loved how the Coen's used the dryness and sound of the boots crunching along the dry earth. If you are looking for standard, mindless, Hollywood fare go to Rocky 100 or some other Hollywood sequel, one dimensional characters, artificial dialog and most of all, nothing that might allow on to "think". This masterpiece is an example where only independent movies and movies from Australia or Europe have any depth to them. Want a bad script, horny teenagers, a contrived love story, mindless escapism, go to Hollywood. This is a classic that will hold up with its timeless theme. Jon "Do not buy this if you haven't seen it" This movie is not for everyone. A lot of critics and movie afficianados love it, but the typical movie viewer may not. For about 90 minutes of its 2 hour length, it drew me in and had me edgy in suspense... and then suddenly there is a sickening plot twist and the last 30 minutes of the movie, the suspense was gone because I no longer cared. The way the plot twist was revealed was a slap in the face to the viewer. I was waiting for the second twist that negates the first twist... a nightmare... a flashback... mistaken identity... but it never came. If you like a good suspense thriller like I do that has a "nice" ending... an ending that leaves you satisfied, then you won't like this. It ends, but doesn't really have an "ending". It was a huge let down to be drawn in for 90 minutes only to be slapped in the face with a shocking twist and a depressing non-ending. Still I was quite entertained for that 90 minutes. I wish I could have written an ending for that story. Rent this first or better yet watch it for free, rather than paying for a dvd you may never want to watch again. "WTF happened to the third act?" This movie breaks the rules of conventional storytelling, and not in a good way. It basically spends two hours building up to a climax, then for some reason skips over that climax completely. It never shows how or why the protagonist meets his fate, I kept expecting a twist after that point or a flashback or SOMETHING but it never came. It has an ending of sorts, one that ignores all of the major characters in favor of the story arc concerning Tommy Lee Jones' character. The problem there is that his sub-plot could be completely thrown away and the rest of the movie wouldn't suffer at all. I kind of get the feeling that the Coens tried to adapt a story about a small town sheriff to film without realizing that all of the interesting parts of the story revolved around all of the other characters, so they focused the movie on the interesting characters and then abandoned all of them for the last 15 minutes in favor of some lame allegory about growing too old to be useful. Don't get me wrong, there are a lot of interesting moments in this movie, I'd say it's even worth watching. It's a good story filled with interesting characters that is ultimately ruined by idiotic choices behind the camera. "No Country - No Aesthetics" Love the video quality, the menus and everything else. Hate the case. Looks cheap and cannot be compared to a special collection DVD box, but that's how all blu-ray discs come so I hope they put more effort in the future and not give us this cheap blue plastic. "WHAT A GREAT ENDING" NO COUNTRY FOR OLD MEN I don't know about you but I have always been a huge fan of the Coen Brothers Joel and Ethan, I have liked every film the two have put together. This is no exception and is just another classic in a long list of classics, both theatrically and on DVD this is a brilliant film. I can honestly say that a lot of the time I do not agree with the winners or even the nominees chosen by the Academy for the Oscar but they got it right with this one. By the way I do not care what people think, that ending was BRILLIANT. The story is all about Llewelyn Moss [Josh Brolin] a normal every day guy who happens to stumble upon something he should not have. When he comes across a massacre and ends up leaving the area with a bag full of money a killer [Javier Bardem] comes after him and one of the best movies ever made starts to unfold. Add in a sheriff who is trying to put this all together played by Tommy Lee Jones and another hired hand played by Woody Harrelson and you have one great scenario taking place. This movie has every thong you could want in a film, there is some good humor although it is on the darker side. There is also not only some good action going on but a really dramatic tale of greed. Don't let any one tell you differently this movie is all about greed and obsession. One mans combo of the two leaves not only him but his family in danger that may even lead to death. Another's combo of the two leads him down the same path while another's completely breaks him. It may seem confusing reading this but when you watch it you will get it, and dare I say you will enjoy it. Writers/directors/producers Coen Brothers have crafted one of the best films to come out in years. The direction of this film can be felt threw out the entire thing and the screenplay is amazing. This could be the best film the two have put together and that is really saying something, come on just think of what these two have made. Acting wise this film shines just as much as Josh Brolin gives one of the best performances of his career. I was really rooting for this guy during this movie even though he brings it all on himself, but man does he give Bardem's character a run for his money. Woody Harrelson is just as good in this film as a hired hand trying to get the money back for his employer. He really shines with his sense of humor in this film and the way he carries himself. Tommy Lee Jones as usual is great as the sheriff who is determined to find his man, so much so that it brings him down. It is somewhat disappointing knowing about the drama going on between him and the studio about this film, mainly because he may never work with the Coen Brothers again. But aside from that we have what has got to be one of the greatest performances in cinematic history, and I am serious when I say that. Javier Bardem turned in one of the best performances I have ever seen, really brought to life one of the most interesting characters I have had the pleasure of viewing. This film is definitely worth your money, I say buy this not rent it. I hear people complain about the ending of this film all the time and I don't understand why. I thought that it was one of the most brilliant endings in a long time; I never thought it would end like that. Maybe because it isn't what would be considered a typical ending people hated on it, but I think that it what makes it so good. I loved it and so did my brother who watched it with me, at least one person agreed with me on that ending.
|
No Country for Old Men
Special offer for you..find the cheapest!
MJW DVD's offers this stuff with condition New, new for:
lesliecook2 from CA, United States offers this stuff for:
thegoodcompany from GA, United States offers this stuff for:
wholesaledvdsforless from MI, United States offers this stuff for:
cdwarehouseonline offers this stuff with condition New, new for:
spring4nix offers this stuff with condition New, new for:
Videos 2 Go offers this stuff with condition New, new for:
Acha Bacha offers this stuff with condition New, new for:
What our customer's say! "Country for All Men!", What a movie! (SPOILER ALERT...DO NOT READ IF YOU HAVEN'T SEEN THE MOVIE) Alexander Borodin plays a heartless killer on the hunt for the same thing as Tommy Jones (the Sheriff on his trial)...life itself. In an absolutely amazing cinematic move, the Cone brothers leave you hanging at the end just like in real life. There are not any messages in this movie, and the viewer is left to make any conclusion that they want, which is the hardest kind of movie to make. Including the sense that the killer is not really as bad of a guy as you might think...he just does what he has to like all of us to make it in life! I hope these guys make another movie, and I bet they will because of all the awards and money they got. "SAVE YOUR TIME.....", I tried to watch this film 3 times on one of the premium channels and fell asleep each time. I guess I don't find the characters that exciting. Sure the film is violent but that doesn't equate to interesting for me. If you like watching a senseless hood track people down to kill them with a "souped up" cow killer, this film is for you. FOR THE REST OF US - WE HAVE BETTER USE FOR OUR TIME. "No Movie For Sensible People", I tried to watch the recent Coen brothers movie No Country For Old Men last night. Real crud. Its based on the novel of the same name by an ultra-pretentious and hyper-established hack named Cormac McCarthy. The story telling (in both the book and movie, I'd imagine) is completely unrealistic. Here's an example of crummy dialog. Trailer trash protagonist to wife as he is heading out the door to do something dangerous: "If'n Ahh don't cum back, say hello to Muther fer me." "But LouEllin, Yer Muther is dade!" (considers a moment) "Well, then Ahh reckin Ahhl tell'r muhself." The movie is psychologically completely unrealistic. For example, toward the end, the "Sheriff" (who does absolutely nothing and seems to have no interest in actually apprehending anyone or doing more than read the paper and occasionally offer a bit of folk wisdom), played by Tommy Lee "Folksy" Jones, ruminates about some dreams he had to his long-suffering wife. "Ahh had me some dreams lass naght." "Anythang innnarestin'?" "They alwuz iaz to the party concerned." Now, this is false. Dreams are a digestive product directly analogous to feces. I have written down my own dreams for more than ten years and can report that frequently I have to force myself to write down a dream, forcibly overcoming an aversion to revisiting it, not because it was unpleasant but simply because the most frequent first impression of most remembered dreams is that the dream is too worthless to recount. But none of this matters in the mind of Cormac McCarthy or the Coen brothers. They are not interested in reality, only gimcrack everyman profundities that fall apart the moment they are looked at steadily. McCarthy is a man who likes the sound of his own supposed eloquence. He is imbued with the notion that just because a sentence comes out of him, it's got to be good. This is what makes for bad, fraudulent writing. Hemingway was exactly the same. And so you have stylized gibberish like when Sheriff Ed Tom Bell (Any real need for that ungainly middle name, Cormac? Usually down south the first and middle names are carefully chosen so that the nicknames can be run together, like Robert Joseph becoming Bobby-Jo.) says of himself and his deceased father, "We wuz sheriffs at the same tahm. Ahh think he's proud of that. Ahh know Ahh wuz." Why the mixing of tenses, other than a knee-jerk narcissistic urge toward pretentious bilge? I mean, why is Sheriff Bell's father, who is deceased, STILL proud of this fact, whereas Sheriff Bell himself is, seemingly, NO LONGER proud of this fact. It's not deep, it's just nonsense. And, no, this is not The Hunting of the Snark. I tried to look at the movie from that angle and it doesn't work. The movie is unrealistic in too many ways to enumerate. However, one example of how crizap No Country For Old Men is, which most people would consider nit-picking, is the following: LouEllin, the trailer trash protagonist, is hunting deer when he stumbles across the scene of a drug deal gone bad, with dead bodies everywhere, a bunch of kilos of Columbian bam-bam and the inevitable tired stock plot element of the Briefcase Full of A LOT of Dirty Money. He then decides that some one of this group who shot each other to hell and gone must have survived and walked away from the scene. So he takes a submachine gun from one of the dead guys and, slinging his own rifle across his back, goes in search of this fugitive. He finds him some while later and, leaving his rifle behind, he goes to investigate holding the newly-acquired (Uzi-like) submachine gun. This is completely unrealistic. No person familiar with guns would, in a bad situation, exchange his own rifle for a weapon he is completely unfamiliar with and which he has never test fired or even inspected to be sure it is not jammed. The movie is full of stuff like this. I believe it won Best Picture. This is what the world is, halfwits making entertainment for halfwits who then praise the other halfwits to the skies. Another key plot device of No Country For Old Men is that the Bad Guy, a killer who dresses all in black, originally enough, goes around with a cattle gun, which is an air powered device that shoots and then retracts a bolt, used to stun cattle. This cattle gun derives its compressed air from a large metal oxygen tank that he lugs around, not to breathe out of but merely to power the cattle gun. He uses this cattle gun to kill people and also, many times, to knock the cylinder clean out of door locks. The scene is, the cattle gun busts the lock cylinder right out of the door and it goes shooting across the room. As I say, this happens many, many times. So this morning I'd had enough of this nonsense and I called a locksmith to ask his opinion. The guy I talked to had actually seen the movie and so he knew exactly what I was talking about. He said that it was completely unrealistic and that he laughed when he saw it. However, this preposterousness did not cause him to stop taking the movie seriously, strangely enough. Seemingly people do not go to see movies expecting any degree of realism of any kind, be it physical, mechanical, psychological, what have you. In short, a people get the movies it deserve. "No Country for Old Men, DVD", DVD arrived within a few days - like brand new. I highly recommend purchasing from this vendor. "Good Acting...nothing else.", If you buy this wanting only to study the acting of the exceptional cast, then you will be very pleased. If you have any concept that this will be a good movie...forget it. It has half a story, literally the story just sort of stops at the half way point. Despite what some reviews have said, not showing what happens to the main characters is not revolutionary story-telling. I know a lot of people don't want to say that this film sucked because the makers are well respected, but it sucked. If it had been made by an indy director it would be getting blasted hard by the same people now singing it's praises. Real life may end with people saying, "Heck with it...I'll just retire", but that's not an ending for any dramatic work. ![]()
Read this reviews before You buy... "Solid if depressing", Great acting, suspenseful, but with a message that evil often wins...riveting at times, disgusting, heart thumping, great action...great acting...worth the effect if you enjoy a kind of lingering depressive effect. I did not sleep well... "Nothing new to see here...", Watching "No Country For Old Men" reminds me of all the carnage and violence you would witness in other films like "The Terminator", "Collateral" and even "Halloween" - where one person (or being) engages in a senseless, non-stop killing spree in order to reach their target. The only difference here is that this film was wrapped up with a pretty bow by being labeled by critics as "artsy" and "intellectually thrilling" because it was viewed at the Cannes Film Festival and it's by the Coen Brothers. Well, whup-dee-damn-do. No matter who was behind it, let's call it what it is, shall we? Another movie with gratituous violence and random murders - nothing more, nothing less. Those elitist critics need to admit that they too, enjoy bloody action horror thrillers just as much as the next person instead of turning their noses up on other films of that genre. The story takes place in rural Texas, 1980. Stoic and menacing hitman and virtual killing machine Anton Chigurh (Javier Bardem) stops at nothing to retrieve a satchel of $2 million in cash from a drug deal gone bad. Vietnam veteran Llewellyn Moss (Josh Brolin), who happened to stumble across a bunch of dead Mexicans at the crime scene in the desert, found the money - and took off with it. As he hunts down Moss, Chigurh leaves destruction in his wake by mowing down (mostly) innocent people in his way who have nothing to do with the theft of the money. This seemed pointless to me and makes it no better than any of those movies I mentioned above (which only one was given serious attention by the Oscars). This is not a horrible film, but I fail to see the reason why it won four Oscars. Unless you happen to be Alfred Hitchcock - what is so artistic about murder? If that's the case, then all those movies that feature homicidal psychopaths like Michael Myers, Freddy Kruger, Jason with the hockey mask and others slaughtering people at will with no cause should have been nominated for Oscars, too. The title, which refers to Tommy Lee Jones' Sheriff Bell character and his buddies, laments the changing times when times were simple in America, and being a law officer was less dangerous. Times when killing for drugs, or for no reason at all was almost unheard of outside of the inner city, the average criminal might be American, and the most daring thing they might have done was knock over a bank for a small pittance. But as Bob Dylan once sang, "The times, they are a-changin'", or as one of the characters sums it up in the movie, "You can't stop what's coming." These "old men" don't feel they have a place in this system anymore, where crimes become increasingly graphic but in turn, people are becoming apathetic in their reactions to it, which is nothing new. The bad guy doesn't always get caught in these times, either - something else that we know as well. Correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't we hear this same type of dialogue before in the excellent thriller "Seven" with Brad Pitt and Morgan Freeman 13 years ago? Now THAT was Oscar-worthy. Jones might as well been playing the same character as Freeman did in that film because they both were police officers who shared the EXACT same philosophies and opinions about life, so there is really nothing new here. As a small town Texas sheriff on the brink of retirement who is trying to protect an on-the-run Moss before Chigurh gets to him, Jones as the aging Bell feels hopelessly out of step with this new breed of criminal, but is determined to keep Moss safe. I have no problem with the ending; it's just that I expected more. As I said previously, "No Country For Old Men" is far from being horrible. But all the accolades it received was only because of who made it. You can try to elevate it above films like "Pulp Fiction" (which is actually a GOOD film), "The Texas Chainsaw Massacre" or even the "A Nightmare on Elm Street" series but truthfully, there's not much difference between those films and this one, except maybe the actors - who do the best they can under the circumstances. IMO, there's nothing special about it, but worth seeing at least once. "Some Fresh Air", In a world where every movie seems to be a re-make of some sort this movie provides a fresh story of its own. Many will probably be annoyed with the lack of closure at the end of the film but in my opinion it adds to the mystic of the story. ""That is no country for old men." - William Butler Yeats", "No Country for Old Men" is a great film which was faithfully adapted from the Cormac McCarthy novel by Joel and Ethan Coen. Their screenplay and direction for the film is superb. The cast is excellent, with solid performances by Josh Brolin and Tommy Lee Jones. Woody Harrelson also makes the most of his small role. The performance that really shines in this film, however, belongs to Javier Bardem. He is absolutely brilliant in his portrayal of the psychopathic killer Anton Chigurh. I don't think it is overstating things by saying that he was able to create one of the best on-screen villains in recent memory, comparable to Anthony Hopkins' Hannibal Lecter and Heath Ledger's Joker. For his efforts, he won an Oscar for Best Performance By An Actor in a Supporting Role, and deservedly so. His very memorable on-screen villain is reason enough to watch this film. The story revolves around Llewelyn Moss, played by Josh Brolin. He discovers the remains of a drug deal gone wrong, including two million dollars. He decides to take the money, and it is not long before someone (Anton Chigurh played by Javier Bardem) comes looking for it. The tension and the drama in this movie start from the very beginning, and only intensify as Anton Chigurh closes in. Tommy Lee Jones plays the investigating sheriff, and the more he sees about the case, the more he starts to question the nature of the world around him. 4 and a half stars...highly recommended. I would also like to recommend the Cormac McCarthy book that the movie is based on, as well as one of his other works, "The Road". "No Country for Old Men" is not quite my favorite Coen brothers movie (that title belongs to "Fargo"), but it is a great film that is almost a masterpiece. It is more than worth both your time and the space on your shelf to add it to your DVD collection. "No Country for Old Men" is rated R for strong graphic violence and some language. It runs for 122 minutes. "Movie: 3.75/5 Picture Quality: 4.75/5 Sound Quality: 4.25/5 Extras: 2/5", Version: U.S.A / Miramax / Region A, B, C Title: No Country For Old Men Aspect ratio: 2.35:1 MPEG-4 AVC BD-50 Running time: 2:02:10 Movie size: 28,65 GB Disc size: 32,26 GB Average video bit rate: 23.18 Mbps LPCM 5.1 4608Kbps 16-bit English DD AC3 5.1 640Kbps English Subtitles: English SDH / French / Spanish Number of chapters: 22 #The Making of No Country for Old Men (SD, 25 minutes) #Diary of a Country Sheriff (SD, 7 minutes) #Working with the Coens (SD, 8 minutes) #Trailers (SD, 4 minutes) ![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Software Download Directory / Files Download / Digital Camera Review
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 22:36:59 GMT
Server: Apache/1.3.37 (Unix) mod_ssl/2.8.28 OpenSSL/0.9.7a mod_deflate/1.0.21 FrontPage/5.0.2.2623 Sun-ONE-ASP/4.0.0
Vary: Host
Last-Modified: Fri, 03 Oct 2008 21:13:00 GMT
ETag: "33151c-56e-48e68adc"
Accept-Ranges: bytes
Content-Length: 1390
Connection: close
Content-Type: text/plain
Free Online Recipe,
Lowongan Kerja,
Indonesia Map,
Kamus,
Video Lyrics,
Health Vitamin,
PAD Generator,
Free Web Template, Wordpress Theme,
Deal Bargain Offers,
Affiliate Datafeed,
Mac OSX Tricks
Online Game Cheat,
Online Flash Game,
Electric Guitar Review,
RC Helicopter Reviews
Ascii Art, Anagram Finder, Clapper Generator, Post-it Note, Dog Name Generator, Freelance Jobs, Network Tools © Copyright 2000 - 2008 . All Rights Reserved. Online Recipe Collection
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||